Access to a high quality spend analytics tool is a critical component of how the modern procurement function operates.

Data analysis has transformed how we assess buying behaviour, identify supply risks and opportunities, and develop our procurement and category strategies.

But over time, outsourcing spend analytics tools has become the industry norm, with third parties hosting company data and displaying it back to the customer via their dashboards.

At DataKITE, we believe it’s time for companies to reassess this approach to spend analytics.

Why should you use an online SaaS spend analytics tool like DataKITE? Here are 5 reasons to bring your Spend Analytics online..

1. Lower Per Solution Cost

One reason procurement teams and IT leaders are selecting SaaS procurement solutions is for the model’s relative low cost, especially in comparison with on-premise counterparts. While organizations are spending more than ever on cloud-based applications, these costs are spread among many different solutions across departments — sometimes hundreds for enterprise companies.

The SaaS model is typically based on a user or usage model, where the company pays per expected user or for the amount of technology consumed. And if the organization uses a cloud cost management solution to track utilization of licenses and they discover that the product isn’t being utilized as intended, they can easily remove or reprovision licenses to reduce costs.

A recent article by Hillary Ohlmann explains the low cost of SaaS like this:

“With SaaS solutions, there are no pricey hardware purchases nor are there expensive local installations. Lower upfront costs mean a quicker ROI. Costs savings don’t end after implementation, either. You won’t have to pay for additional upgrades or maintenance since all of that is taken care of once on the vendor’s end.”

For procurement teams, the cost benefits of SaaS and cloud-based solutions are crucial to consider as they are weighing the pros and cons of each new software purchase..

2. Simplistic Implementation

In a recent interview we conducted with Andy MacMillan, CEO of Act-On Software, he explained “10 years ago companies would have what we called ‘failed deployments’ where a software installation and roll-out could take years … or fail altogether. The cost of these failed deployments was exorbitant,” explained MacMillan. “In today’s SaaS world, we don’t run into that issue and there’s much less risk if a product doesn’t perform as expected.”

While the word “implementation” never sounds fun, the world MacMillan describes no longer exists when it comes to SaaS solutions. Procurement teams and IT leaders are no longer heads down on a single application implementation for months or even years, but rather they can work directly with the vendor’s services team for the implementation in order to be as hand-off as possible. The SaaS model allows them to focus their attention on third-party integrations and internal interconnectivity needs so systems share necessary data.

The end result? A customised solution that’s of high value to your business, at a fraction of the cost.

3. Ability to Test Before Purchasing

In the world of on-premise software, procurement teams would spend significant amounts of time evaluating new software, sitting through demos, and even visiting the vendor’s location to see the solution up close. But only after the implementation process was complete and the software was installed could the team actually put the software to use to ensure it met its standards and operated in an efficient and effective way. There was no “try before you buy” option.

But in today’s SaaS world, it’s very common (almost required at many enterprise companies) that they get to test drive the software, usually via a sandbox in their own organization’s environment. This is to ensure that the solution is a fit and that it will work seamlessly with other applications before committing to the purchase.

“Since SaaS solutions can be accessed through a web browser, vendors frequently offer limited access to their solution before you pay for a monthly or yearly subscription. Being able to try before you buy is a big advantage. This way you can test several possible solutions and find one that truly fits your organization’s needs.”


4. Seamless Scalability

What happens if an organization is scaling quickly, but its software can’t keep up? Procurement teams know that this was the case for on-premise software when it was the primary vehicle for software delivery. Not only was it a huge hassle, but it took significant time for the IT team to reconfigure the components and infrastructure to allow for growth, and also had to be manually installed for every employee upon every new software update.

In today’s SaaS world, though, when a department or team needs to add more seats, they can facilitate the additional users or licenses themselves, rather than disturbing the procurement and IT teams as no on-site needs or team members are required. In addition, relating to point No. 1, the cost of scaling is much less, and can easily be controlled if growth doesn’t occur as originally expected. Using a SaaS license management tool makes it even easier to control user licenses as well.

With new subscription-based applications like DataKITE being added to organizations on a much more rapid basis than previous on-premise solutions that could take months or even years, procurement leaders are able to spend their time on larger, more strategic initiatives. But with many subscriptions being managed and even purchased at the departmental level, leaders across procurement and IT along with executive team members need a new way to better manage SaaS applications across the organization while gaining complete visibility into spend, utilization and feedback.

Without insight into how SaaS applications are being used and how they are performing, how can organizational leaders ensure that their SaaS tech stack is what it needs to be — both now and in the future?